Episodes

  • 'Brother to Brother' & 'Stolen Glasses and Nintendo' & 'Smaller Than Advertised'

    'Brother to Brother' & 'Stolen Glasses and Nintendo' & 'Smaller Than Advertised'
    Jul 3 2025
    First, the plaintiff says the defendant, his younger brother, stole some money from him, so he’s suing. The defendant argues the allegations are false. Then, the plaintiff claims the defendant’s daughter stole her child’s glasses and Nintendo at day care, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant admits there were a few mishaps at the day care, but she can’t get a straight story as to what happened. Plus, the plaintiff says he gave the defendant a deposit for a 5-foot metal trunk, but when it came time to pick up the item, he discovered it was only 3 feet long. He was denied the return of his deposit and is suing. The defendant says he told the plaintiff he doesn’t make 5-foot trunks but was happy to special order one for him. The plaintiff agreed but backed out last minute. He doesn’t owe anything. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show more Show less
    45 mins
  • 'Scalping a Customer' & 'An Act of God?' & 'A Disastrous Apartment'

    'Scalping a Customer' & 'An Act of God?' & 'A Disastrous Apartment'
    Jun 30 2025
    First, the plaintiff went to the defendant for a hair weave, but the hair stylist burned her hair off, and now she’s going bald. The plaintiff is suing for wig products and pain and suffering. The defendant argues the plaintiff was happy with the job and didn’t complain until months later. Then, the plaintiff says some shingles from the defendant’s neglected house blew off and caused damage to his car and window, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the shingles couldn’t have caused the damage the plaintiff is claiming. Plus, the plaintiff lived in the defendants’ apartment, but she hasn’t yet received her security deposit, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendants argue the plaintiff moved out without enough notice, broke things in the home, and kept an illegal pet. The defendants are countersuing for additional damages and repairs. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show more Show less
    46 mins
  • 'Helping Herself to Everything' & 'You Really Blow' & 'Shirt Happens'

    'Helping Herself to Everything' & 'You Really Blow' & 'Shirt Happens'
    Jun 27 2025
    First, the plaintiff says her ex-boyfriend’s mother stole her belongings from a storage unit, so she’s suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff is the one who stole her stuff. The defendant is countersuing for rent and car repairs. Then, the plaintiff rented the defendant a condo, but he up and moved out and left the door unlocked. The place also reeked of smoke. The plaintiff withheld the defendant’s security but is still owed money for rent and electricity, so she’s suing. The defendant argues he agreed with the plaintiff on the moving date and doesn’t owe a dime. Plus, the plaintiff was in the process of developing a clothing line and hired the defendant to print out shirts. However, the defendant never delivered the clothes, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists he told the plaintiff the shirts would be delayed, and he offered the plaintiff a refund, but she refused. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show more Show less
    45 mins
  • 'Rodents In The Attic' & 'You Injured My Dog' & 'Towing Damages'

    'Rodents In The Attic' & 'You Injured My Dog' & 'Towing Damages'
    Jun 26 2025
    First, the plaintiff says he and his wife purchased a house after his return from active duty. Two weeks after moving in, they discovered a bat and mice infestation in the attic. They believe the defendant, who sold them the house, had to know of the problem before the sale. They are suing for the cost of handling the issue. The defendant says he bought the house and flipped it before selling but had no idea of any bat issue. He also claims the plaintiff had the house inspected. Then, the plaintiff claims the defendant was driving distracted when he ran into her dog, resulting in the dog losing his front left leg. She is suing the guy for the cost of vet bills and pain and suffering. The defendant says the dog broke away from his owner and dashed out into traffic, causing the accident, not him. He doesn’t think he owes anything. Plus, the plaintiff claims the defendant towed his car incorrectly, causing damage to the rear differential. He has proof they didn’t do their job like they were supposed to, and he’s suing. The defendants argue they did everything by the book, even putting the car on a flatbed truck, and the plaintiff had no complaints when he picked up the vehicle. They don’t think they’re to blame. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show more Show less
    45 mins
  • 'A Cutoff Cruise' & 'Too Drunk To Drive' & 'Botched House Job'

    'A Cutoff Cruise' & 'Too Drunk To Drive' & 'Botched House Job'
    Jun 25 2025
    First, the plaintiff says that shortly after they started dating, she told the defendant she was going on a cruise with her family. He asked to join, so she booked a spot for him. Not long after, he turned around and went no contact without ever paying her for the cruise. She is suing for her money back. The defendant admits he was interested in going on the cruise with the plaintiff but discovered she was married and a little crazy. He never committed to the cruise, just expressed interest. Then, the plaintiff claims the defendant was drunk and driving down a one-way street in the wrong direction when he crashed into the plaintiff’s car. The defendant’s insurance paid for the damages, but she still wants the impound fees paid for by the defendant, so she’s suing. The defendant is surprised by the lawsuit since his insurance settled up with the plaintiff, and she took her time getting the car out of storage. Plus, the plaintiff says she hired her husband’s cousin to do a siding job for them on their house, and he botched it. She says he admitted after he was done that he didn’t know what he was doing, and she’s suing to get the money back. The defendant says the plaintiff is impossible to please, and he went back three or four times to fix the issues. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show more Show less
    45 mins
  • 'My Husband Took My Stuff' & 'I’d Tap That' & 'Yummy Calf'

    'My Husband Took My Stuff' & 'I’d Tap That' & 'Yummy Calf'
    Jun 24 2025
    First, the plaintiff says her husband, the defendant, took her valuables from a house they shared and refuses to return them. She also says he’s been abusive toward her in the past. She’s suing him for the value of her missing property. The defendant says it was the plaintiff who secretly hired movers and cleaned out his house, so she’s the one who took all the items. Then, the plaintiff says she was parked in her apartment complex when her neighbor backed out and slammed into her car. She witnessed the whole event take place, but the defendant refuses to pay up for the damage, so she’s suing. The defendant admits to tapping the plaintiff’s car, but they both looked at the bumpers and agreed there was no damage. The plaintiff apparently changed her mind several days later. The price of the damage she is also claiming is extremely overstated. Plus, the plaintiff says he and his neighbor are at odds because her dog bit him in the right calf and she doesn’t think it’s her responsibility to pay his medical bills. The defendant was cited by animal control, and he’s suing for his money back. The defendant says the plaintiff never went in an ambulance and she doesn’t believe her 12-year-old dog did anything. She also claims the plaintiff is a seral suer. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show more Show less
    45 mins
  • 'An UnbeWEAVEable Moment' & 'Unpaid Repairs' & 'Can't Stay Afloat'

    'An UnbeWEAVEable Moment' & 'Unpaid Repairs' & 'Can't Stay Afloat'
    Jun 23 2025
    First, the plaintiff says she told her beautician not to use weave glue on her scalp several times during appointments, as she’s allergic to the substance. However, the defendant did just that anyway, causing the plaintiff to have a reaction and need to go out in public with a head wrap on. She’s suing the defendant for her pain and suffering. The defendant says she’s only ever used glue to apply weaves and is shocked she’s being sued because the plaintiff never told her about the allergy. Then, the plaintiff says he did home repairs for the defendant after Hurricane Sandy, but now she’s stiffing him on the cost of his materials and labor. It’s not that she can’t pay him, she just won’t. He’s suing to get his money back. The defendant says the plaintiff is a friend of her sister-in-law’s and is charging her for doing none of the work he says he did. Plus, the plaintiff says he’s been friends with the defendant for a long time and loaned him money during a hard time to keep him afloat. Unfortunately, it’s been over six months, and the plaintiff still has not been paid back, so he’s suing. The defendant says he did borrow money from the plaintiff, but also says the plaintiff owed him money first, so he doesn’t owe anything. He is countersuing for rent money the plaintiff owes him. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show more Show less
    45 mins
  • 'Crown No More' & 'Swimming with Dolphins' & 'Hurricane Damage'

    'Crown No More' & 'Swimming with Dolphins' & 'Hurricane Damage'
    Jun 20 2025
    First, the plaintiff reports that she went to the dentist for a crown procedure, only for that crown to last not even three weeks. She is suing the dentist for pain and suffering to get back the money she spent. The defendant says when the plaintiff came back, she discovered the tooth had cracked. She recommended replacing it, but the plaintiff refused. Since she did what she could in good faith, so she owes nothing. Then, the plaintiff and defendant were friends for 14 years when they planned a trip to Mexico to have some fun. The defendant couldn’t pay for several of the expenses off the bat, so the plaintiff covered the cost. The plaintiff still has not been paid back and is suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff offered to take her on the trip because she had a settlement claim; there was no deal about paying back the plaintiff. Plus, the plaintiff says she was the victim of hurricane damage to her rental space, and the landlord refuses to return her security deposit because she was unable to clear away debris within his unreasonable schedule. She’s suing the landlord now for that deposit back. The defendant says he gave the plaintiff three warnings and plenty of opportunity to remove her items from the property, but she didn’t listen to him, so he used the money to remove her items for her. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show more Show less
    45 mins