Greetings, folks! This week on the podcast, I'm joined by George Ivanoff as we take a deep dive into the apocalyptic trilogy that redefined modern horror—28 Days Later, 28 Weeks Later, and the freshly released 28 Years Later.

We begin by revisiting 28 Days Later, Danny Boyle’s 2002 classic that launched fast-moving infected into the genre and delivered a raw, emotionally charged vision of a crumbling society. The film's meditations on loneliness, moral decay, and the fragility of civilization still resonate, especially in today’s world.

Next, we explore 28 Weeks Later, a sequel that shifts focus from personal survival to institutional failure, showing how military efforts to contain the Rage Virus collapse under pressure, leading to brutal consequences.

Finally, we unpack 28 Years Later, a bold continuation that pushes the franchise into a post-pandemic landscape. Set decades after the original outbreak, the film centers on a new generation, examining tribalism, generational trauma, and hope amid a fractured, quarantined Britain.

Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What's up, you culty loons? This week on the podcast, I sit down with Scott Thomas to dissect one of horror’s most infamous remake showdowns—The Wicker Man (1973) vs. The Wicker Man (2006). We explore the allure of the 1973 folk horror classic, examining its themes of religious conflict, sexual repression, blind faith, and cultural relativism.

Then, the conversation shifts to Nicolas Cage’s wild 2006 remake—a film that’s equal parts psychological thriller, fever dream, and meme-worthy chaos. The episode dives deep into how both versions tackle community versus individualism, human sacrifice, and the symbolic power of ritual.

From the haunting folk songs of the original to the unforgettable “Not the bees!” moment, this discussion pulls apart the artistic intentions, thematic contrasts, character dynamics, and cult legacies of two very different films with the same burning finale.

Whether you're a purist or just here for the insanity, this episode offers a thoughtful journey through one of horror’s strangest cinematic rituals.

Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What's up, freaks? This week on the podcast, I tackle the legacy of Friday the 13th by comparing the 1980 original to its 2009 remake.

We begin with a breakdown of both films—Sean S. Cunningham’s suspenseful whodunit that introduced Pamela Voorhees as one of horror’s earliest female slashers, and Marcus Nispel’s grittier reimagining that transformed Jason into a brutal, territorial hunter. We discuss how the two films differ in structure, tone, violence, character archetypes, and especially in the portrayal of Jason—from a tragic child’s memory to a relentless predator with survivalist instincts.

Despite their differences, both versions share familiar slasher elements: the eerie setting of Camp Crystal Lake, the indulgent teen victims, and the iconic “ki ki ki, ma ma ma” score that still signals incoming doom. We explore recurring themes like grief, vengeance, trauma, and morality, while also unpacking how the franchise has evolved with the times.

Finally, we examine the franchise’s stalled cinematic future, the ongoing legal battle that’s frozen Jason’s return, and the hope offered by A24’s upcoming Crystal Lake prequel series.

Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What’s happening, spooky folk? This week on the podcast, I welcome back Rikki Tikki Timber to break down Jordan Peele’s psychological horror film Get Out.

We explore how Peele uses suspense, dark humor, and disturbing visuals to highlight themes of racism, identity erasure, and control. From the unforgettable “Sunken Place” scene to the coded language of liberal hypocrisy at the Armitage family’s dinner party, we dissect the film’s layered metaphors and social commentary.

We also examine key characters like Chris, Rose, and Rod, and how their roles reflect broader societal dynamics. Together, we dive into the symbolism behind the mysterious "Behold the Coagula" and the Death Cheetah vs. Matter poster in Chris's apartment—unpacking how they enrich the narrative’s deeper messages.

Plus, we discuss the film’s original, darker ending and why Jordan Peele chose to give audiences a rare moment of triumph. This episode is meant to be a tense, thoughtful, and sometimes uncomfortable conversation, but it’s Rikki and I, so we got jokes that are probably not ok.

Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What’s up, humans? This week on the podcast, I’m joined by Chad and Eugene to break down the 2025 sci-fi horror film Companion.

We explore the existential and ethical questions the film raises: Are sentient machines deserving of rights? What defines humanity and self-awareness? We also praise standout performances, such as Sophie Thatcher’s evolution from naive companion to self-aware survivor, and Jack Quaid’s portrayal of a manipulative partner.

We make comparisons to Ex Machina, M3GAN, and Black Mirror, and discuss the film’s major twists. Wrapping up, we, each give a Good, Bad, and Ugly, along with our final scoring of the film. We also weigh in on whether Companion adds anything new to the AI horror conversation or just reboots familiar fears with a glossy finish.

Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What’s up, sleepy heads? This week on the podcast, I’m joined by Jon Yoe as we dive into the nightmares of Springwood to compare A Nightmare on Elm Street from 1984 and its 2010 reimagining. In this episode, we explore how Wes Craven's original reshaped the slasher genre by blending supernatural terror with psychological depth, and introduced one of horror’s most unforgettable villains—Freddy Krueger. We break down the surreal, dream-fueled horror of the original, Freddy’s evolution into a charismatic icon, and how themes like teenage trauma, distrust in authority, and fear of sleep made it a genre-defining film.

Then we shift to the 2010 remake, which aimed to bring a grittier, more grounded version of Freddy to modern audiences. We unpack its emphasis on repressed trauma, psychological realism, and the stark shift in Freddy’s portrayal—from theatrical killer to cold predator.

We also compare the similarities and key differences between the two films, before closing out with a look at the cultural legacy of Elm Street, Freddy’s influence on horror history, and why the remake didn’t quite strike the same chord.

Whether you’re team New Line Cinema or team Platinum Dunes, this episode slices into what makes A Nightmare on Elm Street a pillar of horror—and why Freddy Krueger continues to haunt our collective subconscious.

Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What’s up, horror fans? This week on the podcast, I’m joined by Kyle Prescott, as we dive into three standout alien horror films—Signs from 2002, Dark Skies from 2013, and Nope from 2022. At first glance, they all center on extra-terrestrial threats, but it’s the human drama beneath the surface that unites them. We break down each film’s plot and themes, from Signs' intimate story of faith and grief to Dark Skies' portrayal of a family unraveling under invisible invasion, and Nope’s genre-bending commentary on trauma, spectacle, and survival. Our conversation explores common threads like the focus on family, the fear of the unseen, and how each film uses atmosphere over jump scares to unsettle. We also discuss how these stories reflect deep psychological fears—loss of control, being watched, and the powerlessness of confronting forces beyond comprehension. Whether you’re a fan of slow-burn spiritual horror or mind-bending alien metaphors, this episode uncovers what makes these films terrifying, thought-provoking, and unforgettable.

Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

What’s up, you Thingamajigs? This week on the podcast, Maryland Phil and I, dive deep into two iconic interpretations of John W. Campbell Jr.’s novella Who Goes There?—The Thing from Another World (1951) and John Carpenter’s The Thing (1982). We explore how these two films, separated by three decades, offer drastically different takes on the same terrifying concept.

We start with the 1951 classic, a Cold War-era sci-fi thriller set in an Arctic outpost, where a plant-based alien menace triggers panic and cooperation among a tight-knit military-scientific crew. Then, we descend into the paranoia-soaked landscape of Carpenter’s 1982 remake, where an Antarctic research team is torn apart by a shape-shifting parasite that could be hiding in any one of them.

From Cold War optimism to post-Watergate cynicism, from offscreen menace to grotesque practical effects, we break down:

• Thematic differences: unity vs. paranoia, trust vs. suspicion
• Visual styles and creature design: implied horror vs. unforgettable body horror
• Legacy and influence on modern media: The X-Files, Stranger Things, Among Us, and more

Whether you're a fan of pulp sci-fi or slow-burning existential dread, this episode is for you. Tune in and decide for yourself.

Thank you, everyone, for your support. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out on Instagram at ⁠⁠⁠@so_you_like_horror⁠⁠⁠ or email us directly at soyoulikehorror@gmail.com. We're open to all conversations, suggestions, topics, and criticisms.

#GothBeautiful #SevenPages