Episodes

  • The 1980's versus 2025 - Economic Optimism, Pessimism, and Reality

    The 1980's versus 2025 - Economic Optimism, Pessimism, and Reality
    Apr 11 2025
    1. The Contrast Between Pessimistic Future Outlook and Optimistic Economic Memory:
    • The author observes a common human tendency to view the past through rose-tinted glasses while harboring concerns about the future.
    • "When it comes to the economic climate folks tend to be pessimistic about the future and optimistic in memories. The exact opposite is true!" This opening statement immediately establishes the central argument.
    1. Challenging the Nostalgia for the 1980s:
    • The source directly confronts the popular notion of the 1980s as a universally prosperous economic era.
    • It introduces anecdotal evidence of hardship during that time: "...many Americans were still hitchiking to get around, living from food stamps and collecting S&H green stamps, it was hardly better for the middle class." This aims to ground the discussion in less commonly remembered realities.
    1. Presenting Comparative Economic Data (1989 vs. 2025):
    • The author provides specific figures to compare the economic situation across different time periods.
    • Coca-Cola Price: "In 1989 a 12 pack of coca-cola was $4.00 and now it is $8.00." This illustrates a 100% increase in the price of a common consumer good.
    • Average Income: "The average income then was 30k per year. Now its about 70k." This demonstrates a significant increase in nominal average income (approximately 133%).
    • Average Savings: "In 1989 the average person had $4600 in his or her savings account. Now in 2025 the average American has $63,000." This highlights a substantial increase in average savings.
    1. Argument for Income Growth Outpacing Inflation:
    • Based on the provided data, the author concludes that despite price increases, income growth has been more significant.
    • "So yes prices went up 100% yet incomes far exceeded that!" This is the core of the author's argument regarding the overall improvement in the average American's financial situation.
    • The rhetorical question, "If we deflate prices then can we deflate your income???" suggests that adjusting for inflation would still likely show a net gain in real income and purchasing power for the average individual.
    1. Pessimistic Outlook from Associations (2024):
    • Shifting to the near future, the source presents data indicating a negative economic outlook among associations regarding their members.
    • "In 2024, just 13% of associations anticipate their members facing a more positive economic climate, compared to 25% anticipating a more challenging economic climate." This reveals a prevailing sense of concern about the economic conditions in the immediate future.
    1. Real Estate as a Separate Issue Driven by "Greed":
    • The author briefly touches upon the real estate market, characterizing it as distinct from the broader positive trends argued earlier.
    • "The real estate is a whole other story and we are victims of our own greed!" This suggests a critical view of the factors driving the real estate market, attributing its challenges to potentially unsustainable practices or motivations.
    Key Quotes:
    • "When it comes to the economic climate folks tend to be pessimistic about the future and optimistic in memories. The exact opposite is true!"
    • "...many Americans were still hitchiking to get around, living from food stamps and collecting S&H green stamps, it was hardly better for the middle class."
    • "So yes prices went up 100% yet incomes far exceeded that!"
    • "In 2024, just 13% of associations anticipate their members facing a more positive economic climate, compared to 25% anticipating a more challenging economic climate."
    • "The real estate is a whole other story and we are victims of our own greed!"


    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/republicast-org-conservative-podcast--5437809/support.
    Show more Show less
    5 mins
  • Episode 73 - RepubliCAST - Jay Shapiro the deepest voice in the South

    Episode 73 - RepubliCAST - Jay Shapiro the deepest voice in the South
    Apr 10 2025
    Sharing social media secrets and intel...

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/republicast-org-conservative-podcast--5437809/support.
    Show more Show less
    4 mins
  • Senate Approves Republican Tax and Spending Plan

    Senate Approves Republican Tax and Spending Plan
    Apr 6 2025
    The Senate has approved a Republican-backed framework for trillions of dollars in tax breaks and spending cuts, passing it with a 51-48 vote that largely followed party lines. This framework, championed by former President Trump as a "big, beautiful bill," now moves to the House of Representatives for potential consideration. The legislation has faced strong opposition from Democrats, who argue it disproportionately benefits the wealthy and lays the groundwork for cuts to vital social safety net programs. The timing of the vote is politically sensitive, occurring amidst economic concerns related to tariffs and potential recession.Key Themes and Ideas:Multitrillion-Dollar Tax Breaks and Spending Cuts: The central feature of the framework is a significant package of tax breaks coupled with substantial spending cuts. While the exact figures differ slightly between the Senate and House versions, both involve trillions of dollars over the next decade. The Senate plan includes over $5 trillion in tax cuts, potentially reaching $7 trillion when factoring in additional campaign promises from Trump.Partisan Divide and Opposition: The Senate vote highlighted a deep partisan divide, with nearly all Republicans voting in favor and all Democrats opposed. Two Republican senators, Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky, dissented. Democrats, led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, strongly criticized the plan, labeling Trump's policies a "disaster."Extension of 2017 Tax Cuts: A core Republican argument for the framework is the need to prevent the expiration of individual and estate tax cuts enacted in 2017, which are set to expire at the end of the current year. They frame their actions as preventing a tax increase for most American families.GOP Priorities Included: Beyond the broad tax and spending measures, the Senate package incorporates other Republican priorities, including "$175bn to bolster Trump’s mass deportation effort" and another "$175bn for the Pentagon to build up the military." These funds were reportedly pulled from an earlier budget effort.Democratic Concerns about Impact: Democrats voiced significant concerns that the tax cuts, which they argue disproportionately benefit the wealthy, will necessitate cuts to crucial social programs like Medicaid and Social Security. Schumer stated that Republicans are "laying the groundwork for cutting key safety net programs to help pay for more than $5tn in tax cuts they say disproportionately benefit the rich.""Vote-a-Rama" and Failed Democratic Amendments: Prior to the final vote, Democrats utilized the "vote-a-rama" process to force votes on numerous amendments aimed at making the GOP defend their proposals. These included proposals to ban tax breaks for the wealthy, end Trump's tariffs, limit government downsizing, and protect social programs. All these amendments failed along party lines, except for a GOP amendment to protect Medicare and Medicaid.House Consideration and Potential Challenges: The framework now moves to the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson aims for a vote as soon as next week, with the goal of reaching a final product by Memorial Day. However, significant differences exist between the Senate and House versions. The House had previously approved a plan with $4.5tn in tax breaks and $2tn in budget cuts targeting programs like Medicaid and food stamps, and some House Republicans have "panned the Senate’s approach."Accounting and Deficit Concerns: A major point of contention is the Senate's accounting method, which treats the extension of tax cuts as not adding to future deficits, a position many House Republicans reject. A new estimate projects the tax breaks will add "$5.5tn in debt over the next decade when including interest, and $4.6tn not including interest." The inclusion of additional Trump campaign promises further swells the potential cost to "$7tn."Political Context: The Senate approval comes at a "difficult political moment" with a "churning" US economy following President Trump's tariff scheme, leading to plummeting stock prices and warnings of rising consumer costs and a potential recession. Despite these economic headwinds, GOP leaders, with Trump's support, were "determined to march ahead."Republican Justification: Republicans, such as Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming, argue that the framework fulfills their promises made to voters in November "to secure the border, to rebuild our economy and to restore peace through strength."Important Quotes:Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD): "Let the voting begin." (Said on Friday night as the vote-a-rama commenced).Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY): "Trump’s policies are a disaster... Republicans could snuff it out tonight, if they wanted." (Expressing strong opposition to the framework).Senator John Barrasso (R-WY): "It fulfills our promises to secure the border, to rebuild our economy and to restore peace through strength." (Justifying the Republican ...
    Show more Show less
    16 mins
  • Trump Administration Trade Policy and Tariff Actions

    Trump Administration Trade Policy and Tariff Actions
    Apr 3 2025
    Addressing Decades of Unfair Trade: Smith argues that American manufacturers and farmers have long faced unfair tariffs and non-tariff barriers in foreign markets, designed to disadvantage U.S. products. He contends that past U.S. policy of hoping for reciprocity has failed, leading to negative consequences for the American economy.Quote: "For decades, American manufacturers and farmers have faced numerous unfair tariffs and other trade barriers in dozens of nations around the world that are designed to keep our products out of their markets. For too long U.S. policymakers have hoped that other countries would follow the lead of the United States with relatively low tariffs and other trade barriers, but instead the opposite has often happened."Reversing Negative Economic Impacts: Smith attributes job losses, the decline of small-town America, and increased dependence on foreign countries for essential goods to these unfair trade practices. He suggests that Trump's tariffs are a direct response to these negative trends.Quote: "The result has been job losses for workers, the hollowing out of small-town America, and an increasing dependence on foreign countries for basic necessities."A New "America First" Approach: Smith explicitly states that President Trump is implementing a new "America First" trade policy, recognizing the need for a different strategy to address the issue of unfair trade. He portrays this as "sticking up for working families, farmers, and producers who have suffered years of mistreatment by other nations, both enemies and allies alike."Demand for Reciprocity and Fairness: A central argument is the principle of basic fairness, asserting that foreign companies should face similar tariffs to those encountered by American exporters. The new tariffs are presented as a mechanism to achieve this reciprocal treatment.Quote: "Principles of basic fairness demand that foreign companies should face tariffs similar to those American exporters encounter."Leveraging the Power of the U.S. Market: Smith emphasizes the strategic advantage of the United States being the world's largest market. He argues that the tariffs utilize this power to create a "level playing field" for American stakeholders.Quote: "These tariffs leverage the power of the world’s largest market to create a level playing field for American farmers, producers, and workers."Potential for Future Trade Agreements and Tariff Reduction: While supporting the immediate implementation of tariffs, Smith expresses confidence that they will create leverage for negotiating "new and improved trade agreements" that will ultimately lead to a reduction in tariffs for cooperative countries.Quote: "Under President Trump’s leadership, I am confident the tariffs announced today will be reduced over time on many countries, as we enter into new and improved trade agreements that achieve true fairness for American producers."Generating Revenue: Smith highlights a potential positive economic consequence of the tariffs, stating that they will "continue to generate significant revenue for the United States’s economy," particularly referencing the ongoing tariffs on imports from China.Quote: "The reality is that many trading partners will not be cooperative in reducing their unfair trade barriers, and for that reason, the tariffs announced today will continue to generate significant revenue for the United States’s economy."Drawing Parallels to the China Phase One Agreement: Smith explicitly connects the current tariff strategy to the approach taken during President Trump's first term, which he claims successfully pressured China into the "historic Phase One Agreement" and reversed some of its "abusive trade practices." He suggests the current tariffs aim for similar positive outcomes.Quote: "This strategy mirrors President Trump’s successful negotiating approach during his first term to persuade China to enter into the historic Phase One Agreement that required China to reverse many of its abusive trade practices while retaining U.S. leverage to address remaining unfairness in this trade relationship."Conclusion:Chairman Smith's statement strongly endorses President Trump's new tariffs, framing them as a long-awaited and necessary measure to correct decades of unfair trade practices. He argues that these tariffs will protect American interests, create a level playing field, generate revenue, and potentially lead to more favorable trade agreements in the future, drawing parallels to the perceived success of past trade negotiations under the Trump administration. The statement consistently emphasizes the "America First" principle and positions the tariffs as a defense of American workers, farmers, and producers.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/republicast-org-conservative-podcast--5437809/support.
    Show more Show less
    4 mins
  • The Red Solo Cup: An American Icon and Conservative Symbol

    The Red Solo Cup: An American Icon and Conservative Symbol
    Mar 25 2025
    1. Symbol of Conservative Values: The central theme is the argument that the red Solo cup embodies key conservative values. The author states, "beneath its unassuming exterior lies a story that resonates with conservative values of entrepreneurship, self-reliance, and American ingenuity." This framing positions a common household item as having ideological significance.
    2. Entrepreneurship and the American Dream: The founding of the Solo Cup Company by Leo Hulseman is presented as an "American success story." The text emphasizes his humble beginnings ("started his career by making paper cone cups in his garage") and his vision and work ethic as key factors in the company's success. This narrative aligns with the conservative emphasis on individual initiative and the potential for upward mobility through hard work.
    3. Practicality and Ingenuity: The introduction of the red Solo cup in the 1970s is highlighted as a testament to "American practicality and foresight." The text mentions its durability, convenience, bright color for visibility, ridges for grip, and measured lines for drink volumes as evidence of its thoughtful design and utility. This resonates with a value placed on pragmatic solutions and efficient design.
    4. Freedom and Individualism: The red Solo cup is presented as embodying "the spirit of freedom and individualism." The author connects its presence at tailgates and gatherings to the "freedom to choose—whether you’re enjoying sweet tea, soda, or something stronger—and the ability to gather with like-minded friends and family in an informal, relaxed setting." This links the cup to personal choice and the freedom of association, both often emphasized in conservative thought.
    5. Celebration of Traditional American Gatherings: The text repeatedly mentions the red Solo cup's presence at "college tailgates," "backyard barbecues," "family reunions," and "political rallies" as evidence of its cultural significance. These types of gatherings are often associated with traditional American social structures and celebrations of national identity and shared values.
    6. Cultural Endorsement through Popular Culture: Toby Keith's song "Red Solo Cup" is cited as a pivotal moment in solidifying the cup's symbolic meaning. The author notes that Keith, "a proud patriot known for his support of the military and conservative values," helped turn the cup into "an enduring symbol of American fun and unity." This highlights the role of popular culture in reinforcing and disseminating cultural symbols and their associated values.
    7. Nostalgia for Simpler Times: The text suggests that the red Solo cup "is a reminder of simpler times, where people connected face-to-face, shared stories, and built lasting memories without the distractions of modern technology." This nostalgic framing appeals to a perceived longing for a less complex past, a sentiment often found within conservative viewpoints.


    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/republicast-org-conservative-podcast--5437809/support.
    Show more Show less
    3 mins
  • Kate Bihm Named 2025 Texas Elite Lawyer

    Kate Bihm Named 2025 Texas Elite Lawyer
    Mar 25 2025
    • Recognition as a 2025 Texas Elite Lawyer: The central theme is Kate Bihm's selection as an Elite Lawyer for 2025. The source explicitly states, "The Bihm Firm, PLLC, is proud to share that our founding attorney, Kate Bihm, has been named as an Elite Lawyer for 2025."
    • Significance of the Elite Lawyer Award: The document emphasizes the prestige and criteria of the award, noting that "Elite Lawyer is a rating service and directory that highlights excellent, trustworthy attorneys across the country to prospective clients." Furthermore, it clarifies that the award "is only awarded to the top-performing attorneys across the country every year" and that attorneys are vetted based on "peer recognition, professional reputation, and commitment to the community." Bihm has been recognized as an Elite Lawyer since 2022, indicating sustained high performance.
    • Extensive Legal Experience: Kate Bihm possesses over two decades of legal experience. The source details her background, stating, "Kate founded The Bihm Firm in 2007 after years of working as a district attorney for Montgomery County." Her experience encompasses a broad range of legal areas, including "contentious divorces, highly emotional custody battles, and serious misdemeanor and felony offenses such as theft and drug charges."
    • Founding of The Bihm Firm and Reputation: Bihm established The Bihm Firm in 2007. Since then, she has "garnered a trustworthy reputation with her clients as she prioritizes transparent counsel and aggressive advocacy." This highlights her commitment to client service and effective legal representation.
    • Areas of Legal Expertise: Bihm is recognized for her expertise in "criminal divorce, family law, and defense," as stated in the context of her consistent Elite Lawyer recognition since 2022.
    • Community Involvement: The source highlights Bihm's active role in her local community of Montgomery County. Examples provided include her run for judge of the 9th District Court in the Republican primary in 2016 and her holding office as President of the Montgomery County Bar Association. She has also been a member of the State Bar of Texas since 2003.
    • Prior Accolades: In addition to the Elite Lawyer recognition, the document mentions previous awards and recognitions, including being recognized as "Appellate Attorney of the Year by the Montgomery County Criminal Defense Lawyers Association in 2014" and being named a "Top Lawyer" by Houstonia Magazine on five separate occasions. These accolades further underscore her professional standing and expertise.
    Key Quotes:
    • "The Bihm Firm, PLLC, is proud to share that our founding attorney, Kate Bihm, has been named as an Elite Lawyer for 2025."
    • "Elite Lawyer is a rating service and directory that highlights excellent, trustworthy attorneys across the country to prospective clients."
    • "As an Elite Lawyer since 2022, Kate Bihm has consistently earned the respect of her peers in the areas of criminal divorce, family law, and defense."
    • "Kate founded The Bihm Firm in 2007 after years of working as a district attorney for Montgomery County."
    • "With over two decades of legal experience, she has handled contentious divorces, highly emotional custody battles, and serious misdemeanor and felony offenses such as theft and drug charges."
    • "Since establishing The Bihm Firm, she has garnered a trustworthy reputation with her clients as she prioritizes transparent counsel and aggressive advocacy."
    • "The award of Elite Lawyer is only awarded to the top-performing attorneys across the country every year."
    • "Attorneys are vetted based on peer recognition, professional reputation, and commitment to the community."
    • "Attorney Bihm was recognized as Appellate Attorney of the Year by the Montgomery County Criminal Defense Lawyers Association in 2014."
    Conclusion:The recognition of Kate Bihm as a 2025 Texas Elite Lawyer is a significant achievement that reflects her extensive legal experience, dedication to her clients, respect within the legal community, and commitment to the Montgomery County area. The source material positions this award as a testament to her consistent high performance and ethical practice in the fields of divorce, family law, and criminal defense. Her history of prior accolades and community involvement further solidifies her standing as a reputable and accomplished attorney.

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/republicast-org-conservative-podcast--5437809/support.
    Show more Show less
    6 mins
  • Cocoa Village Named Florida Main Street Program of the Month

    Cocoa Village Named Florida Main Street Program of the Month
    Mar 25 2025
    • Recognition of Community Spirit and Growth: Secretary Byrd explicitly praised Historic Cocoa Village Main Street, stating, "Historic Cocoa Village Main Street embodies community spirit, and I am proud to witness their continued growth.” This underscores the core value and ongoing positive trajectory of the program.
    • Strategic Focus on Economic Development and Heritage: The designation acknowledges HCVMS's dual focus on driving economic growth while preserving and utilizing its historical assets. Secretary Byrd noted that the area "is committed to economic development and leveraging its history to shape a strong future."
    • Historical Context of Cocoa: The source provides a concise history of Cocoa's establishment and development:
    • Settlement by American fishermen around 1860.
    • Establishment of a post office at Magnolia Point in 1871.
    • Erection of the first commercial building in 1881.
    • Initial plotting as "Indian River City," later rejected by the U.S. Postal Service.
    • The name "Cocoa" suggested in 1884, possibly due to the cocoa tree.
    • Founding of the S. F. Travis Hardware store in 1885, which remains the "longest continuously operating business in Cocoa and one of the oldest hardware stores in the state of Florida." This longevity highlights the enduring spirit of the community.
    • Overcoming challenges such as an 1890 fire and the 1894-1895 "Great Freeze."
    • Population fluctuations, dropping to 382 in 1903 but rebounding to 2,200 by 1930.
    • Significant population boom following World War II and the arrival of NASA and the space industry, increasing from 3,098 in 1940 to 12,244 in 1960.
    • Emergence as a tourist destination due to proximity to Cape Canaveral.
    • Current population of over 19,000 residents with a revitalized downtown.
    • Impact and Achievements of Historic Cocoa Village Main Street (HCVMS):Active participant in the Florida Main Street program since 1995 (30 years of involvement).
    • Significant investment and job creation in recent years: "In the last 8 years alone, HCVMS has received more than $20 million in public and private investments, established 110 net new businesses in the district, and created 610 net new jobs." These figures demonstrate the tangible economic impact of the program.
    • Substantial volunteer contribution: "The organization has logged 8,300 volunteer hours over the same time span." This highlights the strong community engagement and dedication to the Main Street program.
    • Active involvement in community improvement initiatives: HCVMS leads efforts in "community clean-ups, landscaping installation and maintenance, and the development of zoning ordinances, interactive maps, and directory signs." This showcases a holistic approach to downtown revitalization.
    • Preservation of historical landmarks: HCVMS played a "crucial role in preserving the Historic Derby Street Chapel, built in 1916." This demonstrates their commitment to preserving the town's heritage.
    • Promotion of economic activity through events: HCVMS hosts "annual events including Art and Craft Fairs, Sip and Strolls, Book Festivals, and Sidewalk Sales to boost foot traffic and promote economic development."
    • Community-focused holiday celebrations: The "Hot Cocoa Holidays" event in November and December, in partnership with the City of Cocoa, features various activities and "proceeds benefiting local charities," further emphasizing community spirit and support.
    Conclusion:The designation of Historic Cocoa Village Main Street as the March 2025 Florida Main Street Program of the Month is a well-deserved recognition of its long-term dedication to economic development, historic preservation, and fostering a strong sense of community. The program's significant achievements in attracting investment, creating jobs, and engaging volunteers underscore its effectiveness and positive impact on the Cocoa Village area. This designation serves as a testament to the collaborative efforts of HCVMS, local businesses, residents, and the City of Cocoa in creating a vibrant and thriving downtown district.

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/republicast-org-conservative-podcast--5437809/support.
    Show more Show less
    6 mins
  • Jason Smith has formally requested the IRS to investigate and potentially revoke the tax-exempt status of the New Georgia Project

    Jason Smith has formally requested the IRS to investigate and potentially revoke the tax-exempt status of the New Georgia Project
    Mar 25 2025
    Review of Chairman Jason Smith's Letter to the IRS Regarding the Tax-Exempt Status of the New Georgia ProjectSource: Excerpts from "Pasted Text" (Presumed to be a press release or news article regarding Chairman Smith's letter)Prepared For: [Intended Audience - To be specified, e.g., Congressional Staff, Legal Counsel, Interested Parties]Executive Summary:Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (MO-08) has formally requested Acting IRS Commissioner Melanie Krause to investigate and ultimately revoke the tax-exempt status of the New Georgia Project (NGP). Founded by Stacey Abrams in 2013, the NGP is a nonprofit organization focused on voter turnout in Georgia. Chairman Smith's request is based on findings by the Georgia State Ethics Commission (GSEC) that the NGP illegally contributed millions to Stacey Abrams's 2018 gubernatorial campaign while under the leadership of then-Executive Director (now U.S. Senator) Raphael Warnock. Smith argues that this activity constitutes illegal political campaign intervention, violating the restrictions placed on 501(c)(3) organizations. This request is part of a broader Ways and Means Committee investigation into abuses within the tax-exempt sector.Main Themes and Important Ideas/Facts:Request for IRS Investigation and Revocation: The central point is Chairman Smith's direct appeal to the IRS to investigate the New Georgia Project and potentially revoke its tax-exempt status. He explicitly states this objective in his letter.Basis of the Request: GSEC Findings: Smith's request is primarily predicated on the findings of the Georgia State Ethics Commission. He highlights the GSEC's determination that the NGP committed 16 violations of state law related to the 2018 election cycle.Quote: "The New Georgia Project, which at the time was led by U.S. Senator Raphael Warnock, admitted to 16 violations of state law. The GSEC found that the New Georgia Project failed to disclose over $4.2 million in contributions and over $3.2 million in expenditures during the 2018 election cycle."Illegal Campaign Intervention: Chairman Smith asserts that the NGP's actions in the 2018 election constituted illegal political campaign intervention in violation of Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3). This section prohibits tax-exempt organizations from participating or intervening in political campaigns.Quote: "As you know, under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3), organizations are strictly prohibited from participating in or intervening in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office."Express Advocacy for Stacey Abrams: Smith emphasizes the GSEC's finding that the NGP's financial activities were aimed at influencing the gubernatorial election to benefit Stacey Abrams's candidacy.Quote: "According to the GSEC’s findings, the New Georgia Project accepted contributions and made expenditures ‘for communications of express advocacy in the 2018 cycle…to influence the election for Governor to the benefit of Stacey Abrams’ candidacy along with other statewide candidates.’"Potential Consequences of Violation: Smith points out the potential repercussions for tax-exempt organizations that engage in political campaign intervention, including revocation of tax-exempt status or the assessment of excise taxes by the IRS.Quote: "The IRS may revoke an organization’s tax-exempt status or assess excise taxes for certain types of violations if it determines the organization is noncompliant as it relates to political campaign intervention."Context of Broader Investigation: Chairman Smith's request is framed within the context of an ongoing Ways and Means Committee investigation into the United States' tax-exempt sector. This suggests a wider concern about potential abuses of tax-exempt status.The briefing doc notes that this investigation has "already uncovered numerous abuses of tax-exempt status."It also mentions previous instances where Chairman Smith called for the revocation of tax-exempt status for organizations with ties to Foreign Terrorist Organizations and support of illegal activity.Reference to a "Sham Charity": The document highlights a recent instance where the Department of Treasury designated the fiscal sponsor of a group previously flagged by Chairman Smith as a "sham charity" supporting a terrorist organization. This underscores the seriousness with which the committee views potential abuses.Key Quotes:"The New Georgia Project, which at the time was led by U.S. Senator Raphael Warnock, admitted to 16 violations of state law. The GSEC found that the New Georgia Project failed to disclose over $4.2 million in contributions and over $3.2 million in expenditures during the 2018 election cycle.""As you know, under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3), organizations are strictly prohibited from participating in or intervening in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office.""According to the...
    Show more Show less
    6 mins
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup