A deadly terror attack in Kashmir has reignited a decades-old conflict between India and Pakistan, pushing the two nuclear powers closer to open war. India’s swift retaliation, including cutting off Pakistan’s vital water supply, has escalated tensions to historic levels. Learn the roots of the Kashmir conflict, its geopolitical stakes, and how it fits into a broader global clash of civilizations shaping the 21st century.

--

Go to https://hometitlelock.com/turleytalks and use promo code TURLEYTALKS to get a FREE title history report so you can find out if you’re already a victim AND 14 days of protection for FREE! And make sure to check out the Million Dollar TripleLock protection details when you get there! Exclusions apply. For details visit https://hometitlelock.com/warranty.

*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.*

Leave a message for Steve! Call now! 717-844-5984

Highlights:

• “The possibility of war between these two nuclear powers is at an all-time high, as Pakistan promises to defend its sovereignty in the face of threats from the Indian government.”
• “The conflict that we’re seeing erupt in Kashmir is precisely the kind of clash of civilizations conflict that Huntington predicted would predominated the 21st century.”

Timestamps:

[01:39] Terrorist attack in Kashmir and the possibility of war between India and Pakistan

[07:00] The historical context of the Kashmir conflict

[10:47] Samuel Huntington’s theory of cleft countries and the clash of civilizations

--

Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.

FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks

Sign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter

**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.