A deep insight into Russia’s self narrative

The chapter on civil war is my favorite as we in the West can learn the most from Russia’s fear of instability

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Very well written

A great read for understanding Russia. A Near Western Country with Western influence. Great history lessons.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Must Reading

Written after the Crimea/Dombas takeover, but before the current invasion of the rest of Ukraine, this scholarly work by an authority on the subject matter, gives us a coherent picture of how the majority of the Russian people have been conditioned to regard the rest of the world, the historical basis for that national outlook, and the stratagems employed by Putin and his predecessors, the Russian military, oligarchical elites, and the Russian Orthodox Church, to perpetuate this outlook. What the author portrays is a national sense of elitism and destiny to rule the world, martyrdom, and constant paranoia about imminent invasion from the "barbarian" western powers of Europe and America.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

The modern Russian myth

The narrative seems a little haphazard but there are lots of useful insights into how many Russian patriots view the world. Spoiler: It is not a friendly place.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Stuffy Tangents: A Story of Russian Invasions

This book could have been cut in half, if not more. The summary is Russia has been invaded a bunch, that's why they are exceptionalist. End of story. The bulk of the book is quotes from books and poems, and other notations from pop culture of the era being described. If extravagant tangents are your jam, this book will be up your alley.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Fantastic

Excellent book to understand how Russia sees themselves. I very much recommend this book if nothing else but to listen to the authors use of vocabulary.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

A bit dry and academic

All nations have their historic tales, and their national culture, and hence the attitudes of the citizens, are built upon those tales. Thus a nation’s attitudes and world views are formed based upon the shared national view of their history and Professor Carleton’s premise is that the Russian world view is based upon the almost continual series of wars that have raged across the Russian land and the fact that many of those wars, and the resulting Russian victories, have protected Europe and what we think of as Western Civilization from the ravages of cultural destruction. That is, Russia, and its people, have served as a shield protecting Europe and, at the same time, Russia has often been the victim of attacks by the very people that Russia has been protecting.

While Russia’s history has been full of wars, Professor Carleton points to three in particular - Russia’s fight against Genghis Kahn, and its eventual ability to throw off the Mongol yoke, Russia’s war against the French under Napoleon and, of course, Russia’s successful defense against Hitler in World War II. He points out that in all three cases Russia’s fight against the foe either protected Europe from those same invaders (the Mongols) or freed Europe from the yoke of the invaders (Napoleon and Hitler), but that Europe, instead of being grateful, has taken advantage of a Russia weakened by those very wars. Thus Russian distrust of The West stems from both the unwillingness of the European nations to acknowledge that their safety has often been at the cost of Russia’s war dead and from those same Europeans taking advantage of a Russia weakened by those very invasions to invade Russia themselves.

Professor Carleton’s main point, I think, is that Western nations, including the European nations, the US, Canada, and others, do not have to actually agree with the Russian view, but should understand that this view is what drives the Russian government and people to view others as they do and that without understanding that view it is impossible to understand the underlying currents of Russian foreign policy. One very enlightening comment was a quote from Czar Alexander that Russia has only two allies - its army and its navy.

The book is interesting, but the presentation is often dry and academic and it is easy to think of this as a textbook for some college course rather than a book aimed at the popular market. The material is not only interesting and informative, but goes a long way to explain why Russia acts and reacts as it does to outside events, and the topics of the Crimea and the breakaway Ukrainian provinces are treated as special topics as is the Russian view that much of The West is doing the work that the German Nazi government attempted to do during the 1930s and mid 1940s. This book is not an apology for Russian behavior and Professor Carleton makes clear that he does not agree with the Russian views, but that it is important to understand the basis for those views to be able to understand the actions the Russian government takes. In that this is a valuable and informative book.

The narration by James Cameron Stewart is very well done. The material is often dry, but Mr Stewart’s narration of it often rescues it and keeps the book alive. While I enjoyed it, I would have enjoyed it quite a bit more had it not been so academic in its presentation.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

12 people found this helpful

Interesting perspective

I had read/heard books about Russia in the context of its national mythos, but not from an exclusively military perspective. It was a fascinating listen with captivating stories and insights.

The book touched on this very briefly towards the end, and the author already did so much, but I'd be interested in hearing more about two things in the future: 1) how and why the Russian people allow this mythos to be used as a catch-all when they are generally the ones to suffer the most (read: be offered up as cannon fodder), and 2) how the "West" can engage Russia and vice-versa without the dynamic laid out in the book becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. Also, not really touched on in this book (aside from tangential mention in the context of the 1904-1905 Russo-Japanese war) is the relationship between Russia and modern China. How do the dynamics plays out there? Same for Turkey (yes, a member of the "West" via NATO, but not really) and Iran.

I'm seeing this mythos being employed in Russian state TV as regards the war in Ukraine in 2022. More militaristic, ultra-nationalist voices in pro-Russian/Z camp Telegram channels are less forgiving of this assumed fate that Russian soldiers must die because such is their fate. They want better armor, weaponry, and strategy for Russian forces in Ukraine. I should add that Russian forces and Russia, in general, should leave Ukraine and restore pre-2014 borders per the 1994 Budapest Memorandum!

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!