Featuring George Marshall

Fell into the common trap of bio's: the latter half of the book was a history of ww2 & the early Cold War as much as a Marshall bio. This is a common problem, and is forgiveable in popular biographies. In this case though, no one reading about George Marshall is unfamiliar with the era - they are reading his bio to add tp

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Adequate but not inspired.

George Marshall, as Chief Of Staff of the US Army during World War 2, was central to the planning, coordination and scheduling of the activities of not only the US military but also, in coordination with the British General Staff, to that of the British and, having read a great deal on the war, I was interested in knowing more about both him and his actions prior to, during and after the war. In particular I was interested in knowing how he, a relatively little known officer in the early 1930s, came to be picked as Army Chief Of Staff over his colleagues, more information about his reputed “little black book” listing the names of those officers he thought both competent and incompetent, his relationship with the British Army General Staff and the Russian political leadership and his actions as Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense after the war. Having read a great deal on the war itself I was familiar with most of his actions during the war and was thus more interested in the periods immediately preceding and following the war.

General Marshall’s life and early military career are covered, although not in much detail. Marshall’s life was full considering his rise through the military, his actions to prepare the US for the war, his actives during the war and his public life after the war and this book, at only 15 1/2 hours, is really too short to give much detail. Eisenhower’s recent biography is more than 28 hours, McArthur’s more than 31 hours, William Manchester’s 3 volume Churchill biography is more than 130 hours and FDR’s is more than 32 hours. By comparison this is a short biography and so can not cover much in detail.

In particular I was disappointed in the book's coverage of the period prior to US entry into the war since it did not go into much detail and I did not get most of my questions answered. The book is more complete in its coverage of General Marshall’s actions during the war and very informative about his actions as Secretary of State and of Defense and gives a great deal of information on his thoughts and actions during the Berlin Airlift, the declaration of independence of Israel, the start of the Korean War and other important events.

Although some of the details in the book are inaccurate or, at least, misleading (General McArthur was ordered out of the Philippines by the President, he did not “abandon” his men, Hitler had no treaty obligation to declare war on the US after Pearl Harbor and I have never seen any other author speak of the French Foreign Legion soldiers as being 2nd or 3rd class troops. John Keegan, in his book on World War 2, refers to them as some of the few first class troops in the Western armies.) I generally found the book to be interesting, if a bit short of detail. Some parts, like the discussions of his family and life long friends, were reasonably complete. Other parts, like his rise through the officer ranks, his interactions with those he later appointed to high position and why he rose in rank so quickly in the late 1930s left a great deal to be desired.

So, in general, I found the coverage of the book to be spotty. Marshall’s early Army life is not covered in much detail, there is a great deal of detail about his participation in World War 2, but that coverage is mostly duplicated in any book covering US participation in the war and his time serving as Secretary of State and, later, of Defense, covers his participation in highly public events and was very informative. Johnny Heller’s narration is adequate although his gravelly voice is, at times, a bit annoying. On the whole 3.5 stars.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

10 people found this helpful

loved it

loved it. was throughout with out being a burden. good insight into the man and the times

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Excellent

Before reading this book I knew very little about Marshall other than the post war plan for rebuilding Europe that bears his name. The book, in my opinion, appeared to be very even handed in how it considered his contributions and in some instances his short comings. It really is amazing how many critical issues that arose just before, during and in the aftermath of WW2 that Marshall played a pivotal role.

Probably will be considered one of the greatest administrators in American Military History, yet he never led troops in battle. He wanted to lead D-Day but was told he was too valuable as Chief of Staff and couldn't be spared. So they settled on one of his favored subordinates - Eisenhower. One of the most fascinating aspects of the book was in the very different perspectives on strategy that the British and American Military leadership had. The British were very dubious of opening up a Northern European front and the American leadership saw little value in the Italian campaign.

His Post War performance, which he was probably most know for, has results that were considered good and also some that were not so good. The success of rebuilding western Europe was balanced with what seemed at the time to be a major failure in China and his lack of control of MacArthur.

Some of the characteristics that made him who he was, were fascinating. He believed strongly in identifying good subordinate leaders and delegating to them as much latitude as could be given. Also seems to have been an extremely hard worker, but one who left work when it was quitting time.

Narration took a little getting used to but was in my opinion very good. If you love WW2 history, I would strongly recommend this book - fascinating description of a Great American.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

4 people found this helpful

An amazing man

I read this book because of the historical value amd to better understand George Marshal. please read

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Excellent. Objective.

Refreshingly objective. Honestly reviews his careers successes and short comings. Valuable for understanding behind the scenes activities of WW2 and early Cold War.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Provided a Balanced Perspective

Would you listen to George Marshall: A Biography again? Why?

Yes. As part of my research in combination with the Kindle version.

What other book might you compare George Marshall: A Biography to and why?

The Wise Men.

What about Johnny Heller’s performance did you like?

Mr. Heller's performance was excellent. It was as if General Marshall was critiquing his own life and accomplishments.

If you were to make a film of this book, what would the tag line be?

Stoic Tenacity in Tumultuous Times

Any additional comments?

General Marshall remains one of my heroes. Admirers of General Marshall should not be afraid to read this book. It will only confirm what you've probably known all along. He was an imperfect human being that rose to the occasion at critical points in history. And, he like Dwight Eisenhower, believed in General Fox Connors advice: "Always make a big deal about your job; never yourself.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

3 people found this helpful

An American Hero

Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why?

Yes. Anyone interested in WWII history should read this book.

What did you like best about this story?

Learning about the life of General Marshall.

Which character – as performed by Johnny Heller – was your favorite?

Gen. Marshall

Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?

I wish I had the time to listen to it all in one sitting.

Any additional comments?

No.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Good biography

Well written. My main observation is that the analysis of Marshall's achievements was balanced by the impact of his character, and focused on the pros and cons of his decisions. The final result of this history, the allied victory, and post war peace and world order, perhaps was affected by his character and spirit more than by his achievements. His temperance and prudence displayed his character, which all admired. I would say he was a man of peace and a great American. Maybe we needed that spirit more than we needed brilliance. I learned a lot of history from this book and got a good insight into the spirit of Marshall and of the times. Johnny Heller did an excellent job with a pleasant and expressive narration.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Good info, dry read.

While the book was very enlightening and educational... It was a little dry and boring at times.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!