Random, directionless mishmash of philosophy and literature, unscientific, contradictory take on cats

Feels like the author googled the topic and found random philosophy and literature by thinkers who loved cats or wrote about them, then makes conjectures about cat biology and behaviour that is simply inaccurate. For example, he lost me when he posited that cats can experience trauma and forget it the next day, and that they are not neurotic in their attachments. I'm not even a cat person and know this to be inaccurate. Not a single citation to science. The context as to why he chose each writer or philosopher, why they are important, and the impact they had is left out, so we learn nothing about cats nor about philosophy. It's just a pretentious, fanciful, forgettable, long winded reminder to chill and practice detachment. It's also a rather cynical and pessimistic take on what makes us human and simplistic, outdated view of the complexity of animals and their neurology and biology. Sometimes it anthromorphasizes cats and other times characterizes them as being lower life forms like a paramecium, with no reference to the complex social worlds of their evolutionary ancestors.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!